Smarter Compliance. You may be aware, and the Royal Commission confirmed, that some Institutional Licensees appointed advisers that a prudent Licensee might not have appointed. The difficulty, we were told, was the lack of an agreed process for reference checking. Until the ABA launched their process in 2018, Licensees had no guidance to follow. Unfortunately, HB 322-2007 “Reference Checking in the Financial Services Industry” was published in 2006-7 and endorsed by ASIC and the relevant Associations at that time. This post doesn’t dwell on the credibility of some licensees failures to adopt industry standards but instead offers three resources that might help those licensees committed to acting efficiently, honestly and fairly.
Smarter Compliance. As easy as it has been to highlight the ignorance and arrogance of some advice ‘leaders’, the reality is that their failings may have been exacerbated by compliance functions that were impotent, ignorant or lacking in courage. In fact, ASIC might add ‘compromised’ as a defining feature of some of these compliance functions. The sad truth is that ASIC was not alone in its criticism of compliance functions; both APRA and the Banking Royal Commission have echoed similar concerns and highlighted a need for the transformation of ‘compliance’. This article considers how burgeoning expectations about competency, capability and courage should apply to your compliance function.
Smarter compliance. Best Interests. Safe Harbours. Client Priority. All the drama with the Royal Commission has distracted attention from the only issue that really matters - To what extent are advisers acting in their clients’ best interests. The short answer from us is that the best advisers have never wavered from their ethical and professional commitment to act objectively in the interests of their clients. For these advice professionals, the best interest duty, simply reconfirmed their approach to advice, service and care. This might not be the case for all advisers. This article explores these issues with reference to both the #BankingRC Final report and Hub24’s excellent 2019 report “The Adviser’s Best Interests Duty: Creating Better Advice.”
Smarter compliance. In a previous newsletter, we addressed five common errors in Self-managed Super Fund advice. We also included some frightening statistics surrounding the level of trustee knowledge, and the adviser’s role in the advice process. In this article, a former adviser draws on his experience to nominate five critical considerations (and accompanying ballads) that deserve closer consideration.
Smarter compliance. For those of us interested in the future of advice (and the far smaller number of us interested in compliance), technology - and, specifically, in regulatory technology (“reg-tech) - is particularly appealing. Well-designed solutions, customised and properly supported, can make advisers and licensees both more efficient and more effective. Better yet, the proper technology can be a source of competitive advantage in a highly regulated industry. This article looks at alternative views, offers seven questions to consider and reminds us that, if we make the wrong calls, technology can be “a good servant but a bad master”
Smarter Compliance. This year will be a challenging and momentous year. Change may be inevitable and irresistible, but it needn’t be fatal. The better licensees and advisers have already separated themselves from the pack and started to transform themselves to succeed in the new environment. This article explores what they’re doing and how they’re doing it. Don’t be left behind.
Smarter Compliance. The business of financial advice is hard. In addition to a range of legal and professional obligations, the complexity of individuals’ specific needs and the challenge of regulatory arbitrage, Licensees and Advisers are expected to be well-informed about an ever increasing number of financial products and platforms. Consistently providing appropriate financial product advice is an insurmountable challenge unless the Licensee has an effective research process and a well constructed APL. In this article, we answer a user’s questions on the role and use of the APL.
Smarter Compliance. 2018 might have been an embarrassing, dramatic and traumatic year for the financial services industry (and the Commission’s Final Report is yet to come) but Compliance Professionals have had enough ‘gloom and doom’ for the moment. As 2019 lurches forward, we identify three ways that 2019 could be a very good year for compliance staff. Sure, you’ll still be over-worked and misunderstood but you may also start to be appreciated and valued. Work smart, seize these opportunities and you’ll transform your role and increase your influence. Good luck.
Smarter Compliance. Since their introduction in 1999, the popularity of the SMSF has remained relatively constant despite the ups and downs experienced within the share market, housing market and industry. We review a lot of advice. While our experience with SMSF doesn’t entirely accord with ASIC’s view that 90% of SMSF advice is ‘poor’, we have noticed some common issues in the advice we have reviewed. This article discusses five elements you need to address to ensure that your SMSF advice doesn’t “suck”.
Smarter Compliance. Happy New Year. 2018 was a challenging year for many Licensees but, for all its tension and drama, it highlighted problems that openAFSL solves and introduced new issues that we had anticipated. While others were caught flat-footed, our reg-tech platform quietly deployed the solution they needed. There’s still time for you and we’re happy to help. Call or email us to learn how OpenAFSL can ensure that you act “efficiently, honestly and fairly” in 2019.